Most Popular Videos
In a democratic political system , the ultimate power is before a body of citizens who has the power to elect their representatives. On the other hand, Centinel argued that the government should not be taken away from the people, as this lead to oppressive to their liberty as well as unresponsive to their needs. According to my viewpoint, I concur with Madison that too much democracy is dangerous.
Thus, there is need to control the degree of democracy in political governance. The paper will be focusing on evaluating why too much democracy can be dangerous, and the precautions that should be undertaken to respond to the primary danger without falling to the other dangerous tendency. Democratic form of government accords people an added advantage as it incorporates their ideas into the system of governance. However, despite this advantage, foolish notions can seize it Kishore Any organization in which democracy rules i.
Majority of members or citizens can pass rules and laws, which suit them, without considering other group members who must adapt to the laws and rules they enact. Judgment is crucial in distinguishing laws, which are reasonable and sensible, from those that are undemocratic, as they are unnecessary, intolerable, and unfair to the minority that oppose them thus impeaching their liberty. Therefore, formal procedure should be set in place to prevent implementation of oppressive laws, as judgment in such matters may fail due to use of majority rule i. Democratic forms of governance do not allow for an efficient functioning of the government.
Precisely, democratic governments strive for independence through the division of the various government arms i.
Such a distinction limits the possibility of arbitrary excesses by the government. The sanction of all the three branches is essential in making, executing and administering of laws and policies. Moreover, none of the above-mentioned branches of a democratic form of national governance can function independently from each other Ebony, For example, in the United States, the congress, which is the legislative arm, has an impeachment body to check on the executive arm i.
Furthermore, Separation of powers inevitably means split of responsibility, which leads to friction amongst the separated organs at the expense of cultivating cooperation for the mutual benefit of all. The other possible danger of too much democracy is the possibility of making wrong choices. According to the principles of democracy , the common man has all the powers or rather rights to elect their government as well as their main authorities.
However, too much of these powers can sometimes be dangerous based on various reasons. For instance, it is evident that not all the people are aware of the political conditions in their country Kishore, Additionally, majority of the common people are not familiar political issues affecting their society. Thus, there is a danger of making wrong choices during elections, which in turn bring into power individuals who are likely to misuse the rule of democracy.
Without the right people in the government, development in all perspectives would be difficult. As such, certain measures should be put into place to ensure that the common people do not misuse their supreme democratic powers by making wrong choices. However, a number of arguments have been put forward against the idea of removing the government too far from the people, or rather having a political system with too little democracy.
Based on this argument, changing the constitution requires agreement of majority of the representatives of the people whom they elected.
- essay on the uses and abuses of cell phones in 250 words;
- CONCEPT OF DEMOCRACY Essay!
- old age homes research paper.
- Search form.
- assumption dissertation writing!
- Long and Short Essay on Democracy in India in English.
It can also be done through the court, if the court believes that there is need for such changes for the benefit of the people collectively Ebony, The other way through which the constitution can be changed is through a referendum, where the everybody in the country is entitled to give opinions regarding the proposed changes.
Additionally, separation of powers into the judicial branch, the legislative branch, and the executive branch, impose considerable challenges for a small majority to enforce their will. The second argument that has been highlighted by the proponents of too much democracy against limitation of democracy is that minorities and majorities can take distinctly different shape on diverse matters.
It is evident that individuals would agree with the viewpoints of the majority on some issues, as well as with the minority on some other issues. Besides, the views of most people keep on changing depending on circumstances Guiner, As such, members of the majority may not advocate for the coercion of the minority, simply because they may form part of the minority in the future and the same thing night happen to them. Lastly, it is also argued that regardless of the risks of the tyranny of the majority, the rule of majority is the most preferred system as compared to other systems.
Besides, tyranny of the majority is considered as being an upgrading of the tyranny of the minority William and Theodore, Arguably, most of the above mentioned problems of the tyranny of the majority or rather too much democracy can also be witnessed in less democracies, adding to the problem of oppression of the majority by the minority. According to the advocates of democracy, studies indicate that more democracy reduces mass killing by the government as well as internal violence.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that a democratic political system has its advantages. However, too much democracy can be dangerous, as once said by James Madison. Regardless of the arguments that have been put forward by the proponents of democracy against limitation or control of democracy, I believe that there is need to set limits of democracy in any given country.
One of the arguments for limitation of democracy is that the tyranny of the majority may agree to oppression of the minority groups. Besides, separation of powers among the various branches may limit efficient functioning of the government. Finally, there is a possibility of the majority making wrong choices as far as governance is concerned.
Therefore, there is need to control democracy to avoid emergence of the tyranny of the majority. While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. Waste no more time! It is widespread among the low and middle income earners in these countries. Though many of those affected may live in denial of their state, it is a grim reality they have. According to this theory, we can never perceive objects directly, as all we perceive is sense data.
There are a number of arguments used to prove that w do only perceive sense da. Indigenous Disadvantage essay In this essay, I will argue that in order to break the generational cycle of welfare dependency and disadvantage in a large majority of Indigenous communities, government policies need to be shaped to address the early educational requirements of children. I will highlight that the National Int.
Free Essays Must Be Free! Concept Of Democracy Essay While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements.grupoavigase.com/includes/283/3754-eventos-en.php
The Global Crisis of Democracy - WSJ
The word democracy has many connotations which vary with time, place and individuals who view the concept. The term has several different senses in contemporary use. The discussion that follows is in an attempt to make some contribution on nature, origin and basis of democracy in the world. In this view, it represents a form of government in which the whole right to make political decisions is exercised directly by a whole body of decisions acting under procedures of a majority rule.
Democracy as the Best Form of Government Essay
Another definition has been given by the Britannica Encyclopedia which defines democracy as a form of government in which the citizens exercise the same right, not in person but through representatives chosen and responsible to them. Power can either be exercised directly by them. Another alternate definition given is that democracy is that class of people which has no hereditary or special rank privilege ;common people.
It traces its origin in the 5th century BC to denote the political systems then existing in Greek city states, notably Athens.
Essay about democracy
Majority rule was an intentionally pejorative diminution urged by the Greek. It meant self-government through an assembly of equal male citizens who gathered in a market place or town district for purpose of discussing some matter, putting different opinions to vote, and deciding often by majority of raised hands what course of action was to be taken. While theoretically these definitions are in opposition, in practice the distinction has been blurred historically.
The political system of classical Athens, for example, granted democratic citizenship to an elite class of free men and excluded women and slaves from the political participation. In virtually all democratic movements throughout ancient and modern history, democratic citizenship consisted of an elite class until full enfranchisement has won for all adult citizens in most modern economies through suffrage movements of the 19th and 20th century.
- Democracy essays.
- supply chain management with lean production and rfid application a case study.
- The Global Crisis of Democracy;
- Freedom, not fascism, writes E.B. White in ‘On Democracy’ - glichbogosulre.ga!
- Democracy and Me Student Essay Competition!
Within the Athenian democratic movement, many philosophers from all over the Greek world gathered to develop their theories on the definitions of democracy. Socrates was the first to raise the question about what is the relation or position of an individual within a community. However, it was Aristotle who laid the foundations of political philosophy. Aristotle systematically analyzed the different rules that the Greek city states and categorized them into three categories on how many ruled: the many democracy or policy , the few aristocracy or oligarchy , a single person tyranny or autocracy.
But one factor of liberty is to govern and be governed in turn, for popular principle of justice is to have an equality according to number, not worth, and if this is the principle of justice prevailing, the multitude must be of necessity be sovereign and decision of majority must be final and must constitute justice, for they say that each of the citizens ought to have an equal share.